It is widely acknowledged that human activity, primarily burning fossil fuels to produce energy, is contributing to climate change.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the world’s leading climate authority, has stated that urgent action is needed to avoid the effects of dangerous climate change, including more frequent extreme weather events such as droughts, floods and hurricanes.
We want to be part of the solution to climate change and are committed to reducing our impact. As well as benefiting the environment, taking action on climate change helps us cut costs, improves our reputation with stakeholders and helps us prepare for future legislation on emissions.
Read about our energy and climate change position
In 2007, following the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, we launched a new climate change programme and committed to new targets.
This includes a commitment to reducing our climate change impact (CO2 equivalent emissions) and energy use in operations and transport from 2006 levels by 20 per cent per unit of sales (based on a constant exchange rate) by 2010 and by 45 per cent by 2015.
This replaced our 2006 target to reduce energy use by one per cent per year, normalised by sales.
We will achieve our new targets by:
The Corporate Executive Team has approved a central fund to help finance these energy saving projects. The Climate Change and Energy Reduction team consulted with GSK businesses to identify potential energy saving projects. In 2008, 171 projects were completed which are expected to result in a saving of more than 153,000 Kwh (550,800 GJ) of energy per year and more than 40 thousand tonnes of climate change emissions.
Product climate impact
We are also researching ways to minimise the amount of greenhouse gases released when our propellant inhaler products are used by patients for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. These account for two-thirds of our climate impact. Propellant inhalers contain either hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs) or chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) which ensure a consistent dose but HFAs are 1,400 times more damaging to the climate than CO2 and some CFCs are more than 10,000 times more damaging to the climate than CO2. CFCs also deplete the ozone layer.
SGS assurance logo