The Chief Executive Officer’s Environment, Health and Safety (EHS) Excellence Awards Programme promotes improvements in GlaxoSmithKline’s use of human, environmental and economic resources. It rewards innovation, effective over the long term, that can be shared within the company. Nominations of projects to be considered in the programme may come from any part of the organisation. A panel of experts recommends award winners from a list of finalist projects prepared for them by a review committee internal to GlaxoSmithKline. The expert panel is drawn from academia, government and non-government organisations, and includes a member of the Board of Directors. Sir Christopher Hogg, Chairman of the Board in 2004, participated on the panel.
The programme makes awards in three categories. Initiatives that foster responsible use of human, environmental and economic resources with the local community may be awarded an EHS Community partnership award. Projects that benefit environment, health and safety through new and efficient chemistry or technology may win a Green chemistry/green technology award. Programmes that demonstrate improvements in environment or health and safety management and performance may win an EHS Initiative Award. In 2004, because of the large number of entries in this category, awards were made in two subgroups: EHS initiative - environment and EHS initiative - safety. Each winning site is recognised with a specially designed trophy and the opportunity to make a donation to a charitable organisation selected by the winning team.
In 2004, the third year of the awards programme, 120 projects were nominated to the programme, 27 per cent more than in 2003. 64 GSK sites in 32 countries submitted entries. 12 sites in 12 countries participated for the first time. This year, 12 projects received top honours. The winners were
First place:
Evreux, France (Global Manufacturing and Supply, New Product and Global Supply)
for “EHS School Challenge”. The EHS School Challenge aims to raise
awareness of EHS issues among local school children. In 2003, over fourteen
schools took part in the initiative.
Second place:
Xochimilco, Mexico (Pharmaceuticals International and Global Manufacturing and
Supply, Regional Pharma Supply) for “Working With Our Neighbours”.
The site supports a range of projects to help Mixteca ethnic communities. Examples
include: training for over four thousand “health promoters”, supporting
a clinic for cervical-uterine cancer and assisting local women to establish
a chicken farm for food and income.
Third place:
Sonepat, India (Global Manufacturing and Supply, Consumer Healthcare Supply)
for “Project Pragati”. Project Pragati (pragati means development)
provides support to local communities, including an eye clinic (to address the
high incidence of eye problems in the area), training of village women as seamstresses,
traffic and pedestrian safety education sessions and helping to fund a fire
engine.
Back
to top First place:
Verona, Italy (Research & development) for “Environmentally Friendly
Synthesis of GW597599B”. Novel techniques have been used to remove several
hazardous substances, including triphosgene, from the production process of
GW597599B (which is being tested to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and
vomiting).
Second place:
Cork, Eire (Research & development and Global Manufacturing and Supply,
Primary Supply and Antibiotics) for “GW572016 Solvent Usage Reduction”.
A 35 per cent reduction in solvent use and energy savings have been achieved by re-designing
the process for making GW572016 (used to treat solid tumours).
Third place:
Stevenage, United Kingdom, (Research & development) for “Development
Of GW273629 Route of Manufacture”. A new process has been developed to
produce GW273629 (used in the treatment of migraines). This avoids the use of
dioxane, a carcinogenic chemical, and eliminates the use of DMF, a solvent listed
as a reproductive hazard under the Solvent Emissions Directive. It also saves
energy and reduces waste. Overall, improvements to the process have reduced
costs by £1,000 per kg, an annual saving of £30 million based on
projected peak production of 30 tonnes per year.
Back
to top First place:
Bogotá, Colombia (Global Manufacturing and Supply, Consumer Healthcare
Supply) for “Pharmaceutical Waste Bioremediation”. The pioneering
use of reed bed technology for the treatment of pharmaceutical waste in Colombia
has led to a 60 per cent reduction in the cost of final waste treatment.
Second place:
Cairo, Egypt (Global Manufacturing and Supply, Regional Pharma Supply) for
“Waste Re-use And Reduced Resource Consumption”. A new process was
designed to re-use waste gelatine in the encapsulation process – reducing
waste and resource consumption.
Third place:
Barnard Castle, United Kingdom Global Manufacturing and Supply, New Product
and Global Supply) for “Increased Mass Conversion Efficiency Of Cephalosporin
Oral Products”. Improvements to the process of producing cephalosporin
(an antibiotic) have significantly reduced the amount of waste - helping to
divert over 1 tonne per year of active pharmaceutical ingredient from incineration.
Back
to top First place:
Barnard Castle, United Kingdom Global Manufacturing and Supply, New Product
and Global Supply) for “Ergonomic Improvements”. The site has successfully
raised employee awareness of ergonomic risks. Teams have identified and completed
59 ergonomic improvement projects and ergonomic experts are consulted on the
design of new equipment.
Second place:
Nabha, India (Global Manufacturing and Supply, Consumer Healthcare Supply)
for “EHS Strategy and Mechanical Scraping Machine”. The site, which
produces malted food, implemented a new EHS Strategy. This resulted in the development
of a new mechanised scraping machine (used in the tray drying process), which
has reduced workers’ exposure to moving parts and the risk of repetitive
strain injury.
Third place:
Mayenne France (Global Manufacturing and Supply, Primary Supply and Antibiotics
Supply) for “Control of Driving Risks”. The site has organised driving
safety courses for employees for five years. Each year about 50 employees complete
a one-day training session, including classroom presentations and practical
workshops where drivers learn to control their cars in emergencies.
In 2004 winning project teams nominated the following charitable organisations to receive donations:
Back
to topAwards 2003
In 2003, the second year of the awards programme, 94 projects were nominated
to the programme, over a third more than in 2002. Over a third more sites (53)
in 20 countries participated. The research & development organisation entered
projects for the first time.
In 2003, 11 projects received top honours. The winners were:
EHS community partnershipFirst place:
“Good Corporate Citizenship”, global manufacturing and Supply,
Consumer Healthcare Supply, Rajahmundry, India.
Second place:
“Managing the Marshes”, global manufacturing and supply, primary
supply Dartford, United Kingdom.
Third place:
“Leadership on Reduction of Mercury Contributions to Area Surface Waters”,
US Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, United States.
Back
to topFirst place:
“Discovery and development of a green process”, research & development,
Tonbridge, United Kingdom.
Second place:
“Tranilast: improved production process”, Research & development,
Upper Merion, United States.
Third place (2):
“Nano Filtration Curbs Production Losses”, global manufacturing
and supply, primary supply Ulverston, United Kingdom tied with
“Photochemistry - A brighter future”, research & development, Upper
Merion, United States.
Back
to topFirst place:
“Resource Reduction: Water Conservation, Effluent Reduction and Turbo
Generator”, Global Manufacturing and Supply, Consumer Healthcare Supply,
Rajahmundry, India.
Second place:
“Bio-composting of Solid Wastes”, global manufacturing and supply,
Consumer Healthcare Supply, Nabha and Rajahmundry, India.
Third place (2):
“Observations in the Workplace Leading to Safety -OWLS” global manufacturing
and Supply, Primary Supply, Cork, Ireland tied with “EHS
Risk Mitigation Initiatives” , Global Manufacturing and Supply, International
Supply, Thane, India.
In 2003 winning project teams nominated the following charitable organisations to receive donations:
Back
to topAwards 2002
In 2002, the first year of the awards programme, 67 applications were received
from 40 sites in 20 countries. The winners in the first year were:
First place:
“Helping Hands To Small Businesses” Ulverston, GMS Primary
Supply
Back
to topFirst place:
“Innovative Health and Safety Concepts and Approach for Construction
of New Horlicks Facility” Sonepat, India. GMS Consumer Healthcare.
“Waste Management Projects at Ankleshwar” Ankleshwar, India. GMS Primary Supply.
Third place:“Leave Work The Way You Came – A Total Approach to Safety in a Manufacturing Organisation” Aiken, USA. GMS Consumer Healthcare.
Special commendation:“Integral Waste Management System” Bogota, Colombia. GMS Consumer Healthcare.
Special commendation:“Safety And Environmental Achievements in Demolition And Construction Activities For Augmentin XR Tablet” Quality Road, Singapore. GMS Primary.
Back
to topThere were no green chemistry/green technology awards made in 2002.
In 2002 winning project teams nominated the following charitable organisations to receive donations:
Members of the external selection panel who helped in the adjudication of the awards selected the following organisations to receive donations from GSK on their behalf:
Back to top


This section contains information in several formats:
To download PDF files you will need Adobe Reader. If you do not have it installed, it is available free from the Adobe website. PDF links on this site open in a new window.
For audio-visual content you can use either Windows Media Player or Real Player, which can be installed free from their respective websites.