In 2004 we conducted our second global leadership survey of GSK managers. The survey was completed by over 9,500 managers in all countries where GSK operates (an 83% response rate). It tracked their views against our first survey in 2002 and against findings from other global companies such as IBM and Microsoft.
Key survey findings
The responses were generally more positive than in 2002. There was a significant
improvement in the number of positive responses to 29 out of 31 core questions
and, overall, responses were on average 4 points higher than two years ago.
Areas that received high scores included business ethics, with 92% of managers reporting that they understand how the GSK code of conduct applies to their job responsibilities, pride in the company and clarity about how their role is aligned with GSK’s wider strategy and mission. For example:
Back to top| 2004 (%) | 2002 (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| People in my department show commitment to performance with integrity | 91 |
88 |
| I can see a clear link between my work and the company’s objectives | 87 |
85 |
| The people I work with cooperate to get the job done | 87 |
82 |
| I am proud to be part of GSK | 83 |
78 |
| Strategies in my department support the pursuit of the GSK mission | 85 |
81 |
| People in my department are committed and enabled to make meaningful contributions | 82 |
76 |
| I feel encouraged to come up with new and better ways of doing things | 77 |
74 |
| I can report unethical practices without fear of reprisal | 76 |
70 |
| I would gladly refer a good friend or family member to GSK for employment | 78 |
72 |
The survey also produced clear messages about areas for improvement. Quite a few managers expressed concerns about workload and also frustrations about not being able to do their best work. The areas that received lower scores still showed improvement over 2002 and included:
| 2004 (%) | 2002 (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| The amount of work I am expected to do is about right | 45 |
42 |
| GSK is a company where great people can do their best work | 52 |
46 |
| When choices have to be made, my manager usually places quality over other business objectives (deadlines, budget, etc.) | 54 |
48 |
| How satisfied are you with the recognition you receive for doing a good job? | 57 |
56 |
| Sufficient effort is made to get the opinions and thinking of people who work here | 59 |
51 |
| Leaders in my department act as teachers, coaches, and champions of development | 59 |
54 |
| I receive ongoing feedback that helps me improve my performance | 61 |
57 |
Comparisons with other companies
Responses to many of the survey questions can be compared with those given by
employees of other companies through a cross-company database. This includes
responses from around three million employees in 139 countries.
GSK scored highly compared to other companies in several areas. These include:
We scored below average in other areas, including:
It is important to understand the context of this second finding. This is a business where exceptionally high quality standards are built in at every level. Analysis of the response with employees indicated that their concern was related to hitting deadlines, rather than quality per se.
Back to topImprovement plans
The survey findings have been reviewed by GSK’s Corporate Executive Team
and our business units are developing plans to deliver improvements in key areas.
For example, additional ethics training is planned for parts of the business that scored lower than the GSK average on business ethics questions. Other business units are looking at ways to improve the effectiveness of their employee development, coaching and feedback systems.
Back to top
This section contains information in several formats:
To download PDF files you will need Adobe Reader. If you do not have it installed, it is available free from the Adobe website. PDF links on this site open in a new window.
For audio-visual content you can use either Windows Media Player or Real Player, which can be installed free from their respective websites.